Microsoft has updated its controversial You Tube App for Windows Phone. It has removed the video download functionality, but hasn't added the facility to display ads. This isn't likely to be anywhere near enough for Google and how it resolves the issue is important for all of us.
As we reported last week, see Google Takes On Ad-Blocker Microsoft for the full story, when Google declined to produce a You Tube app for Windows Phone 8, or provide access to the full API to make the task easy, Microsoft produced its own You Tube app by some nifty reverse engineering.
The resulting app, released on May 7th had two signifcant differences from the standard Google - originated smartphone You Tube App - it permitted downloads of videos and it didn't include any advertising.
It took just over a week for Google to respond with a cease-and-desist notice on May 15th which gave Microsoft until May 22nd to pull the app.
As Google's main complaint appeared to be that the lack of advertising negatively affect developers who depended on such revenue Microsoft initially responded by saying it would be "more than happy" to include advertisements if Google gave access to the APIs.
Something that Google hasn't done.
Rather than pull the app, Microsoft produced an updated version on May 22nd and a statement:
“Microsoft updated the Windows Phone YouTube app to address the restricted video and offline video access concerns voiced by Google last week. We have been in contact with Google and continue to believe that our two companies can work together to hone an app that benefits our mutual customers, partners and content providers."
What Microsoft hasn't done is to enable advertising in the You Tube app, something that is certainly not beyond its capability. This is presumably to put pressure on Google to provide it with the full official API.
How this turns out will influence the future for all developers wanting to use APIs that give their competitors the edge.
Have you had a suspicion that your GPS app is overestimating the distance traveled? If so you are probably correct but the reason isn't an algorithmic glitch. The answer lies in the statistics and it [ ... ]