Listing is the final operation and if you have been following the descriptions of the other operations you should be able to guess how it is going to work.
First all of the elements in the filter with a count of one have valid data and key storage elements. So the first task is to scan the storage and extract all of the elements with B[i].count=1. You can then add
to the output list.
Notice there will be duplicates but this doesn't matter as you can remove duplicate keys.
This isn't the end of what you can do, however, because if you remove all such entries from the filter then there is a chance that it will undo any collisions that they caused. If this reduces the count of any element to one then another data element can be retrieved.
So the full algorithm is:
while there is an B[i].count=1 do add (B[i].key,B[i].value) to the output list perform DELETE(B[i].key,B[i].value) end while if the list is not empty set incomplete_list return output_list
You can see that if all of the collisions can be undone then the list should be empty at the end of the operation,
This corresponds to the operation:
LISTENTRIES(): list all the key-value pairs being stored in B. With low (inverse polynomial in t) probability, this operation may return a partial list along with an incomplete_list status.
So how well does this work?
In terms of performance, if you are using k hash functions and the array has t elements then insertions, deletions and lookups take O(k) and listing takes O(t).
The probability that a GET operation will return a "not found" error, i.e. the data might be in the table but due to collisions it cannot be found, when the data actually is in the table is the same as the false positive rate for the corresponding Bloom filter.
where k is the number of hash functions, m is the size of the bit array and n is the number of items stored in the bit array.
This can be made as small as you like by increasing the number of hash functions in use and the size of the table. The same is true of the probability of getting an incomplete listing of the data from the table - roughly O(t-k+2) as long as some conditions are met.
The invertible Bloom filter has lots of surprising uses including working out if two databases or two sets store the same elements. Basically what you do is create an invertible filter from one set, then delete all the elements of the other set and the elements that are left at the end of the operation are those that were only in one of the two sets.
You can even discover what the elements are and which set they belonged to, but this is another story.
Do you manage to walk a crowded street without bumping into people or having near misses as you try to pass? If so you probably learned how to do it in a very similar way to this socially aware robot, [ ... ]
Benchmarking is both essential and a distortion. The trouble is that once there is a benchmark that anyone pays any attention to, the tendency is to tweak for a high score - even if this results in a [ ... ]