Page 1 of 3
There is a big problem with disk drives. No, not the constant running out of space that we used to suffer from, but the deeper computer science and engineering problem of actually making them useful at all.
We are so familiar with disk drives being delivered to us in a usable form that it is first necessary to go back to the raw hardware to see what the problem is.
In a hard disk drive the data is stored on the disk as magnetic patterns written in complete concentric tracks. More accurately each track is split into a number of different sectors and data can be read or written by specifying the head, track and sector involved.
If you want to read head 2, track 10, sector 5 then the hard disk moves its head array to track 10 and reads the sector markers passing underneath head 2 until it detects sector 5. Then, and only then, does it start reading data and passing it on to the CPU or to memory for later use.
Notice that you can read or write a sector but you can’t work with anything smaller and if you want to work with anything bigger you need to manipulate multiple sectors. This is the main characteristic of a “block” device. It can read or write a block of data of a given size and everything you do with it has to take this into account.
Compare a block device with the behaviour of main memory (RAM) and you will begin to see the difference and the similarities. To access main memory you give an address and this results in a single word of data being retrieved. To access a block device, a hard disk say, you have to supply head, track and sector numbers and a block of data is retrieved.
At this point you might like to ask yourself what is wrong with this arrangement. If it is good enough for main memory it should work for disk drives!
Well imagine that you now want to edit the letter you wrote last week. It is stored at head 2, track 5, sector 6 and you are required to specify this as 2,5,6 when the text editor asks what you want to edit. If the letter is large enough to fill more than one sector you will have to remember the follow on sector’s address as well as the next and the next and so on…
You now begin to see the problem. Hard disk manufacturers leave the stage at the point where the hard disk is working but only in terms of the computer supplying simple read/write commands and head, track and sector addresses. What is needed is something to turn this into an easy to use storage device with a filing system.
Files and filing systems
You could see the filing system as a hardware problem but, when you start thinking of how flexible it has to be, it very rapidly turns into a software problem. It is much easier to write some software to organise the disk into a filing system than it is to build custom hardware to do the same job.
This software was initially called a “DOS” standing for Disk Operating System but later on the term became expanded to cover all sorts of additional features such as looking after other I/O devices. That is the term DOS became synonymous with Operating System because managing the disk was the main task of any OS. Today we tend to think of the operating system as more than just a DOS and the term File System is often used to refer to that part of an OS which manages the disk or any mass storage device.
The creation of a DOS, and the disk drives themselves, has often been a chicken and egg type of problem. Large computer companies such as IBM had no such difficulties. They could build a disk drive and assign the manpower needed to write the DOS to make it useful. Smaller companies might be able to produce an add-on disk drive for a mini-computer, say, but where the DOS was to come from was left to the customers.
In the early days many a non-specialist programmer had had the task of putting together a custom DOS for a cheap disk drive, usually a floppy disk drive..
This was particularly true during the microprocessor revolution. We all got landed with the CP/M operating system because an early Intel development system needed a DOS to be useful and Gary Kildall wrote one. You could even say that we are still landed with Windows because Microsoft produced a DOS for the new 16-bit generation of Intel processors. It is even claimed that Bill Gates himself invented a basic method or organising a disk drive, the FAT, and hence implementing a DOS – but this I doubt.