Angular has reinvented itself from the ground up in the form of Angular 2.0.0 launched today in a special meetup at Google HQ. Now all we have to do is forget Angular 1.
As the launch announcement puts it:
"Angular 1 first solved the problem of how to develop for an emerging web. Six years later, the challenges faced by today’s application developers, and the sophistication of the devices that applications must support, have both changed immensely. With this release, and its more capable versions of the Router, Forms, and other core APIs, today you can build amazing apps for any platform. If you prefer your own approach, Angular is also modular and flexible, so you can use your favorite third-party library or write your own."
This approach would either kill Angular 1, Angular 2 or both. As things seem to be turning out Angular 2 is still of great interest and Angular 1 is for legacy only. This means that most Angular programmer have been using the betas and release candidates to get ahead and won't be surprised by anything in the final release.
The good news is that Angular 2 is here and we can start using it without reservations about production quality or not. The new version also introduces semantic versioning with the usual major.minor.patch numbering.
So where next?
It is to be hoped that the stability of version 2.0.0 gives everyone time to consolidate and write some good documentation. Planned for the future are:
Bug fixes and non-breaking features for APIs marked as stable
More guides and live examples specific to your use cases
More work on animations
Angular Material 2
Moving WebWorkers out of experimental
More features and more languages for Angular Universal
Even more speed and payload size improvements
The one thing that Angular programmers really don't want to read is that version 2.1.0 isn't backward compatible with 2.0.0 - but they wouldn't do that would they?
Software patents are usually patents on the obvious wrapped up in as obscure, vague and technical a language as possible. In this case Google has been found guilty of infringing a "sandbox" patent in [ ... ]