|Intel - The Microprocessor Revolution|
|Thursday, 05 August 2010|
Page 1 of 4Intel is celebrating the 40th anniversary of its 4004 microprocessor, the first customer programmable chip and the one that led on to the Intel design dominating the processors we use. We look at how all this came to pass.
Silicon Valley is the legendary centre of electronics and computing excellence where big companies, such as Intel, make large sums of money out of very small things indeed.
It started to grow from the seed planted by Shockley Semiconductor. The first big success was Fairchild, set up by the Traitorous Eight who left Shockley after only a year. Robert Noyce and Jean Hoerni went on to invent the basic process that made the integrated circuit a reality, but soon companies all across the States were making use of their idea. Logic gates were to be had from many sources and the role of Silicon Valley was that of just another supplier.
But things were not as quite as they looked.
Fairchild Semiconductors had been set up with the backing of its parent company Fairchild Camera and Instrument Corporation with the option to buy out the eight founding engineers at any time - and with promise of huge profits that’s exactly what it did. The result was an even greater fragmentation of the talent that Shockley had gathered together and the eventual birth of the most important of the Silicon Valley companies, Intel.
When the Fairchild Camera and Instrument Corporation bought back its company, in 1969, each of its founders received $250,000 of stock in return for their $500 investment.
“For a young guy to walk away with a quarter million dollars a year later was not a bad deal”,
The money was enough to buy the freedom to do something different and many of Noyce’s colleagues did just that - they set up their own companies.
Robert Noyce (1927-1990)
Robert Noyce and Gordon Moore stayed on. However, although Noyce was General Manager, with responsibility for 15,000 employees and a company that was still growing, he was beginning to think about alternatives. Despite being an enthusiastic pilot, he was growing bored with having to fly across the country to New York to talk the parent company.
(born 3rd January 1929 San Francisco)
Gordon Moore, the man known for his theory expounded in 1965 (Moore's Law) that the number of components on a computer chip would double every year, and Robert Noyce were beginning to think about the possibility of starting their own company to do the things they were interested in.
Even though Fairchild was successful, semiconductors were still seen as a high risk and very complex business. There were some good examples of failure, Shockley Semiconductor for example, to dampen an investor’s enthusiasm.
Noyce and Moore thought that the most profitable thing to do would be to build solid state memory chips. From our point of view this seems obvious but at the time the dominant memory technology was magnetic core and its manufacturers were always managing to push down its price and size to say ahead of any alternatives that might appear.
Semiconductor memory sounded exotic, extravagant and very unknown. It also seemed like a big step to go from the tens of transistors per chip to the hundreds that a solid state memory device would require. Even with their quarter of a million dollars each they needed more cash for the complicated process they were working on.
As Noyce noted,
“one of the traps that young companies fall into is running out of money right on schedule but not getting the product out right on schedule!”
The solution to the cash problem came in the form of Arthur Rock who had helped to arrange the original financing of Fairchild. He had become a successful venture capitalist in San Francisco and he numbered among Noyce’s acquaintances.
“It was a very natural thing to go to Art and say ‘Incidentally Art, do you have an extra $2.5 million you would like to put on the crap table?’”
recalled Noyce. As it happened he did, but not before grilling Noyce for some time about his aims and hopes for the new company. Rock’s method of discovering the truth about a proposition was to talk until the proposer was tired and then talk some more.
|Last Updated ( Wednesday, 16 November 2011 )|